Skip to main content

Where do I settle down -city, town or vilage?

Whenever I discuss the topic of where one prefers to settle down in life - a Metro city, a town or a rural area - I sense that the views expressed by friends have a lot of ifs and buts sewed in.

For example, one common response from people who have never lived in a village, but only visited them now and then - I wish I could just live peacefully in a village, amid the greenery, and non-polluted space. All I need is a decent internet connection.

And of course, I don't have any friends living in villages right now. In fact, most people these days don't have friends living in Indian villages. We all have friends in American or British or even Scandinavian hinterlands. But not in the Indian rural spaces. (If you have a rich farmer friend or old parents and uncles looking after huge ancestral property its a different thing.)

Take the case of Indian towns. We may have a few business men friends or guys working on PSU banks, small universities etc. living these towns. How many of us have close friends staying in towns doing a job commensurate with their skills and qualifications, and earning well? And not dreaming about moving to a big city?Even if we want to escape the frenzy of the cities and live in quieter towns, what kind of jobs are available for highly qualified professionals?

Let me put down what we all know as a general state of affairs:

1. Life in a village has always been idealised. But if you ask the villagers moving to the cities in search of jobs, you get a different picture. Also, if you stay for a reasonably longer period in a typical Indian village, you will find the lack of basic infrastructure(sanitary and drainage, power, health care, potable water, transport), the caste divisions, the cynical politics etc. as unbearable.

2. Towns are better off. Most towns these days have the basic infrastructure sorted out to some extent. But they are no where comparable to the cities in terms of opportunities.

3. The cities - ok..the overcrowded areas, the creaking infrastructure, the inflation, and yes, the pollution.

If we look at the US, and other developed nations - except for the niche opportunities space, it usually does not matter where you live - if all you want is a decent income, and adequate infrastructure. In fact, as most of us may have experienced, life in an American town is infinitely more comfortable than life in an American big city. And in the UK, you can live in a village and travel to the nearest town for work.

What does this tell us?

  • Towns offer us the best chance of - urbanizing our rural people, decongesting our cities, and spreading the wealth creation process into the hinterland.
  • We need more non-polluting businesses ( IT services, BPOs, research labs etc) to move to Indian towns and act as anchor customers for good infrastructure to be created.
  • However, for young professionals to move into towns, they expect the infrastructure to be already there to justify the move.
  • We can't yet give up on the cities. But some radical urban planning reform needs to happen.
  • We should protect the greenery and environment. But I don't think we should have the 'villages' as they are today.Reduce the number of people dependent on agriculture, and make farming more productive (one and the same actually !).

Our current development models seem to treat each entity (city, town and village) as separate. We need models that make movement of services and businesses feasible between these entities. We can not sustain a scenario where evrybody wants to move to a Metro. We need to create facilities comparable to Metros in semi-urban and rural areas.

I think the number of people prefering to stay in towns and villages is an underestimated development indicator.


Popular posts from this blog

General Elections 2009 - Analysis of AP Results

Caution: Long post :)

The newspapers, the blogworld, and the electronic media are full of election results analysis this week. With the amazing victory of Indian National Congress (INC) led UPA in the Lok Sabha elections, and the INC's successful defense of its citadel in Andhra Pradesh (AP), hopes have been raised because of assured stability at both centre and state for the next five years.

Even though I am not a supporter of Congress politics, I find it hard not to feel happy about the results because: 1.The Left has been routed in its strongholds and 2.Indian electorate has decisively voted for a National party(though for the wrong one !) ; except for Bihar and Orissa, INC has fared well wherever it was pitted against the regional parties. This bodes well for our polity. I will have another post where I am going to look at the short, medium and long term possibilities for inclusive growth and economic policy under the new dispensation.

For now, I would like to indulge in some ana…

How I (could have) made Rs.100,000 from Rs.25,000 investment in 4 months..

Note:This may read like a story.But it is not. I actually want to talk about an investment idea.But as I can never get to the point quickly, you, my reader, has to read through my 'sonta dabba' (trans: blowing one's trumpet) first.

I have a friend called Srinivas who directed a critically acclaimed, but commercially not very successful Telugu movie. This was a few years ago. Srinivas and I worked on a script last year, and we were ready to meet producers around March of this year. We did meet a couple of producers who showed interest.And then the farming bug bit Srinivas big time.

Actually, Srinivas was always interested in rural development and leveraging traditional knowledge systems along with modern technology.We both had many conversations around how, by creating a database of traditional farming techniques, we could make the knowledge available to every one. We would discuss the script for a while, and then drift into a discussion on farming stories. We both have come …

Dharmic Nationalism, Gorakhnath Math, and Ram Janmabhoomi

The Nath Tradition and Dharmic Nationalism
The Nath Sampradaya (tradition) has historical references only since the 12th century CE with Gorakshanath/Gorakhnath or may be from 9th C. with Matsyendranath yogi. The Naths started calling themselves by that name only after the British rule started in India.
However, the Nath tradition, by virtue of being one of the Shaivite traditions, and the syncretic influence of Buddhism and Jainism, is but a newer name (new, as in the medieval era) for the ancient Sidda tradition. The codification and practice of Hatha Yoga is attributed to this tradition. They consider Shiva as the Adi Nath (the first guru). If you are connecting this with Jaggi Vasudev’s Adi Yogi statue, and Hatha Yoga courses, you are making the right connection.
The Siddas/Naths have spread throughout the country since ancient times, but due to the bewildering variety of languages, cultures and socio-economic conditions, the names morphed, the rituals differ ever so slightly, and…